I wrote about HRV in the past and how I found it an extremely useful metric. As HRV4Training website put it:
Heart Rate Variability (HRV) insights to help you quantify stress,
better balance training and lifestyle,
and improve performance
In this post, I want to compare HRV data collected between Garmin and HRV4Training, as well as the "readiness score" these two sources produce. The data is for two months period, in which I was training for a marathon, and for that time I use Garmin Fenix 7 with an alpha/beta version of the software.
In this chart, you can see HRV values between Garmin and HRV4Training
Some additional background:
You can see when I was sick and after the races my HRV was pretty low. In my opinion, trendings are very similar, especially in the last 3 weeks around the races and sickness.
Since HRV is mainly about how stressed you are and how hard you should train I've decided to compare also training readiness functionalities.
Even though I have a Garmin device with HRV capabilities I still find HRV4Training useful, since it has questionnaire so in that way you not only can see the HRV value but also has context around it. And I believe having a context is very important.
On top of that HRV4Training costs only 10 euros ( or less ) compared to high-end Garmin devices, which means you can buy a cheaper device and still enjoy that functionality.
As a dedicated runner, finding the perfect training partner to help you reach your goals can make all the difference.
Two running pods that provide very similar data, but what's the difference?
Data comparing from running, sleep, hrv, hr, steps and everything that can be compared.